CP NewsAlert: Pope Francis to visit Edmonton, Quebec and Iqaluit in July

By Jessica Gresko in Washington

WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court was changed by the shocking leak of a draft opinion earlier this month. The opinion suggests the court is set to strike down the abortion rights recognized almost 50 years ago in Roe v. Wade.

Curator Thomas, who joined the court in 1991 and has long sought the quashing of Roe v. Wadedescribed the leak as an unthinkable breach of trust.

“When you lose that trust, especially in the institution I’m in, it fundamentally changes the institution. You start looking over your shoulder. It’s like a kind of infidelity that you can explain, but you can’t undo it,” he said at a Friday night conference in Dallas.

The court said the draft does not represent the final position of any of the court members, and Chief Justice John Roberts said ordered an investigation into the leak.

Thomas, a candidate for President George HW Bush, said it was beyond “anyone’s imagination” before the May 2 leak of opinion to Politico that even one line of a draft opinion would be published in advance, let alone a complete draft of almost 100 pages. Politico also reported that in addition to Thomas, conservative justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with draft opinion author Samuel Alito to overturn Roe v Wade and a 1992 decision, Planned. Parenthood v. Casey, which upheld Roe’s conclusion of a constitutional right to abortion.

Thomas said that previously, “if someone said one line of an opinion” would be leaked, the response would have been, “Oh, that’s impossible.” Nobody would ever do that.

“Now that trust or that belief is gone forever,” Thomas said at the Old Parkland conference, which describes itself as a conference “to discuss proven alternative approaches to addressing the challenges facing black Americans today.” today”.

Thomas also said at one point, “I think what happened in court is extremely bad…I wonder how long we’re going to have these institutions at the rate we’re undermining them.”

Thomas also touched in passing on the protests by liberals at the homes of conservative judges in Maryland and Virginia which followed the publication of the draft opinion. Thomas argued that the Conservatives have never acted this way.

“You would never visit the homes of Supreme Court Justices when things were not going our way. We didn’t have any tantrums. I think it’s incumbent on us to always act appropriately and not refund tit for tat,” he said.

Demonstrations at the Supreme Court and across the country were planned for Saturday.

Neither Thomas nor any of the participants in the Dallas session mentioned the January 6 insurrection or the actions of Thomas’s wife, Virginia, in the fight to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Clarence Thomas was speaking in front of an audience as part of a conversation with John Yoowho is now a law professor at Berkeley but worked for Thomas for a year in the early 1990s as a lawyer.

Each judge typically has four clerks each year, and the current group of clerks has been the subject of speculation as a possible source of the leaked draft notice. They are one of the few groups, along with judges and some administrative staff, to have access to draft opinions.

Thomas also answered a few questions from the audience, including one from a man who asked about friendships between liberal and conservative justices on the court, such as a well-known friendship between late liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the late conservative judge Antonin Scalia. “How can we foster that same type of relationship within Congress and within the general public?” asked the man.

“Well, I’m just worried about keeping him on the pitch now,” Thomas replied. He then spoke glowingly about former colleagues. “It’s not the court of this era,” he said.

Despite her comments, Thomas seemed in good spirits – occasionally laughing heartily. Yoo, who is known for writing the so-called “torture memos” that the George W. Bush administration used to justify the use of “enhanced interrogation” techniques after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, said stated at one point that he had taken pictures of notes Thomas had taken during the lecture.

“Are you going to divulge them?” asked Thomas laughing.

Yoo replied, “Well, I know where to go… Politico will post whatever I give them now.”

Comments are closed.